• Mar 31, 2016 News!JACN Vol.3, No.3 has been indexed by EI (inspec)!   [Click]
  • Jun 24, 2016 News!JACN Vol.4, No.2 has been published with online version. 15 papres about advances in computer networks are published in this issue.   [Click]
  • Mar 31, 2016 News!JACN Vol.3, No.2 has been indexed by EI (inspec)!   [Click]
General Information
    • ISSN: 1793-8244
    • Frequency: Quarterly
    • DOI: 10.18178/JACN
    • Editor-in-Chief: Dr. Ka Wai Gary Wong
    • Executive Editor: Ms. Julia S. Ma
    • Abstracting/ Indexing: EI (INSPEC, IET), Engineering & Technology Digital Library, DOAJ, Electronic Journals Library, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, International Computer Science Digital Library (ICSDL), ProQuest, and Google Scholar.
    • E-mail: jacn@ejournal.net
Editor-in-chief
Dr. Ka Wai Gary Wong
Department of Mathematics and Information Technology The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong
It's a honor to serve as the editor-in-chief of JACN. I'll work together with the editors and reviewers to help the journal progress
JACN 2016 Vol.4(1): 46-51 ISSN: 1793-8244
DOI: 10.18178/JACN.2016.4.1.202

The Effect of the Position of BS and the Size of Network on the Decision of Implementing a Centralized or a Distributed Clustering in WSNs

İpek Abasikeleş-Turgut
Abstract—Due to the resource limitations of the sensor nodes, the most important issue in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is prolonging overall network lifetime by using energy-efficient routing algorithms. Cluster-based routing protocols have proven to be effective in network topology management, energy minimization and data aggregation. Clustering process can be conducted by a distributed or a centralized manner. In this paper, a distributed and a centralized clustering algorithms are scrutinized under different network parameters, including the size of the network and the location of the base station. The results are evaluated by using the death of the first node and the death of the last node since they are the indicators of the quality and the lifetime of the network. The results show that the distributed approach performs better than the centralized equivalent up to 24.5% for small scale networks when the BS is inside the network. However, as the size of the network increases or as the BS moves away from the network, the centralized approach gets the advantage.

Index Terms—Base station, centralized clustering, distributed clustering, network size, wireless sensor networks.

İpek Abasıkeleş-Turgut is with İskenderun Technical University, Hatay, Turkey (e-mail: abasip@gmail.com).

[PDF]

Cite:İpek Abasikeleş-Turgut, "The Effect of the Position of BS and the Size of Network on the Decision of Implementing a Centralized or a Distributed Clustering in WSNs," Journal of Advances in Computer Networks vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46-51, 2016.

Copyright © 2008-2016. Journal of Advances in Computer Networks.  All rights reserved.
E-mail: jacn@ejournal.net